Reflection:
Using
the Gibb’s Reflective Model I will reflect on the ninth Lab session we had for this
semester. It took place on the 4th and 5th of November.
Description: This week we solved the IV therapy workbook and
spent the first hour learning about how to perform an aseptic technique when
handling needles and equipment, how to insert an IV cannula, calculate the drip
rate, set up an IV set, connect it to an extension, connect the IV line to a IV
bag and prime the IV line. For this part of the session I understood where
everything went and how it all worked. I was also able to correctly calculate
the drip rate. Also, my teacher showed me how to improvise by hanging the IV fluid on a spine board to free my hands. In the second hour, we practiced the approach to a cardiac
patient. I went first and my patient was diaphoretic and had difficulty
breathing. I had good communication with the patient, remembered to do an ECG
this time, gathered the history appropriately, and performed the VSS. However,
after I found out the patient had dyspnea it took me a few minutes before I
auscultated her chest. Moreover, I saw her SpO2 was 89% so I decided
to give her oxygen. When I provided her
with oxygen, I used a nebulizer mask instead of a non-rebreather mask. This was
a terrible mistake. However, my teacher notified me of my mistake and I fixed
it. A while after I put the
non-rebreather mask on the pt., her SpO2 went up to 96% and I
instantly, without thinking, removed the mask, only to put it back on a few
minutes later when the SpO2 dropped. After that I discovered the
patient was diabetic, however, it slipped my mind to take a BGL measurement and
also that diabetic pts. usually present with no chest pain during an MI. The
patient’s ECG rhythm was sinus tachycardia, and I said I would perform a
12-lead ECG to check for a possible infarction that wasn’t visible on a 3-lead.
In the next session,
we further practiced IV cannulation and setting up an IV line. After that we
performed another cardiac patient scenario. My patient presented with severe
chest pain and difficulty breathing. He was tahcycardiac and hypertensive and
his ECG rhythm was sinus tachycardia. I took all the history using PQRST and
SAMPLE and performed a thorough VSS. This time I used a non-rebreather mask to
deliver oxygen to the pt. As the scenario progressed the pt.’s rhythm suddenly
became an ST elevation. I decided to provide morphine, nitrates, aspirin, and
continue oxygen administration. My teacher later remarked I could have also
prepared double cannulas to prepare for any possible upcoming emergency.
Feelings: At the beginning of the first session I felt
really excited to learn about the preparation process of IV equipment. Later on,
right before I started the scenario, I felt confident, but that changed really
quickly. As I progressed through the scenario I made multiple mistakes and I
didn’t feel very confident and felt lost and confused. My systematic approach
was all jumbled up in my head and I was struggling to fully understand the
scenario. By the end of that session I felt upset at myself for messing up so
bad.
In the second session, for the IV practice I felt at ease
and capable, since I understood everything the day before. After that, when we
were practicing a cardiac patient scenario, I felt nervous at the start.
However, I stuck to the systematic approach this time and managed the scenario
well. This made me feel so good and when my teacher said I did very well, I
felt much more confident.
Evaluation: Learning about IV preparation was a really good
experience, since I understood everything involved in the process. Also, it was
great to be able to practice this skill individually. This made me more aware
of every step of the process, which helped me understand everything. I would
say the scenario in the first session was a bad experience, however, without it
I don’t think I would have been able to do as well the next session. It was
good to make all those mistakes because it was like a wakeup call for me to
step up my game. This made my experience in the second session so much better.
Also, being able to know my mistakes the first time and fixing them in the next
session was a really good learning experience for me.
Analysis: My mistakes in the first scenario were due to a
lack of organization of my thoughts. I didn’t follow a systematic and logical
approach and that lead to me missing out crucial steps. For example, BGL measurement for the diabetic patient is
something I know. However, I didn’t preplan my approach or think logically about
the scenario, and that lead to me missing that important assessment. Also, now
I realize that if I start a scenario without a set plan I am bound to forget
things and end up confused. In the second session I revised my approach and
that was the key to me performing much better.
Conclusion: I could have been more focused and thoughtful of
what was unfolding throughout the scenario. Also, I should have revised the
steps for approaching the cardiac patient beforehand. This could have lead me
to assess the patient appropriately and not forget anything.
Action Plan: My plan is to revise the OSCE marking sheet for
approaching the cardiac patient. This is in order for me to be able to have a pitch
perfect and systematic approach, and to stop me from forgetting anything.
Moreover, I will look through the OSCE sheet for IV preparation and practice
drug calculations. That is to be prepared for the next session, in which we
will be preparing an IV set and calculating and counting the drip rate.
| Picture 1: Calculation of the drip rate |
| Picture 2: IV cannula inserted and IV set primed |
| Picture 3: IV fluid hung on a spine board to improvise |
| Picture 4: IV chamber with set drip rate |
Domain
Knowledge:
This week we took about pacemakers. Sick sinus syndrome is the general term for a group of dysrhythmmias caused by the malfunction of the sinus node. Most commonly caused by ischemic heart disease. In this case the patient must be paced using a pacemaker. A pacemaker can be external, tansvenous or implantable. On an ECG its very obvious.
| Picture 5: ECG with a pacemaker |
Pacemakers can be atrial, ventricular, or for both (dual chamber). A patient is usually given Aspirin after this to avoid blood from coagulating on the wires of the pacemaker. Pacemakers can also sense the RR and blood pH.
Problems faced by a pacemaker are failure to sense, capture, and pace. Failure to sense in from the pacemaker's failure to sense the heart's intrinsic electrical activity. It generates a pacing spike at inappropriate times. This is very dangerous and could lead to the RonT phenomenon. Failure to capture is when the paced stimulus does not result in myocardial depolarization. The pacemaker spikes are not followed by a P wave or QRS complex. Most likely cause is that the output current of the pacemaker is too low. Failure to sense and capture can occur in the same patient. Failure to pace means the pacemaker is doing nothing. If a patient with a ventricular pacemaker has a STEMI, they cannot be diagnosed from an ECG, they are diagnosed by their history and inhospital ultrasound.
Pacemakers can be placed in both ventricles (biventricular pacing) and this is called cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT).
Some indications for implanting a pacemaker in a patient are:
- The patient has had a past episode of VF or VT arrest
- had at least one episode of VT
- had a previous heart attack and an increased risk for sudden cardiac arrest or death
- hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Enquiry
and Research:
Pacemakers consist of a controller pack that contains the battery and programmable hardware and wire electrodes that are attached to the heart chambers that need to be stimulated (Wesley,2011).
Pacemakers have two functions: to sense the atrial and/or ventricular electrical activity and the second is to pace, during which the electrode generates and electrical discharge to depolarize the myocardium. The timing cycle consists of a lower rate limit (LR) and a ventricular refractory period. If an intrinsic QRS complex occurs the LR time is started from that point. If there is no QRS and the LR is reached the pacemaker will spike.
| Picture 6: Table of the pacemaker codes. Adopted from (Wesley,2011) |
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy (ICD) involves the internal placement of a device capable of delivering electrical shocks to the heart to terminate life threatening rhythms, such as VT and VF. Like the pacemaker except instead of a simple electrode in the rt ventricle, there is a special electrode touching more surface area of the endocardium. This electrode delivers the life-saving shock to the heart in the event of lethal ventricular dysrhythmmias. It can deliver anitachycardia pacing and cardioversion shocks for VT and defibrillation shocks for VF (Wesley, 2011).
A really good illustration of the pacemaker in the heart is found on the following link (AHA, 2015). The one in the illustration is a ventricular pacemaker. The link is: http://watchlearnlive.heart.org/CVML_Player.php?moduleSelect=pacmkr
| Picture 7: Reading from (Wesley, 2011). |
| Picture 8: Readings from (Wesley, 2011) |
When ICDs are delivering shocks inappropriately, they can be disabled using a ring magnet. This magnet can temporarily disable the shock capability of an ICD. However, the magnet does not disable the pacing capability for treating bradycardia.The ECG rhythm must be monitored at all times when the ICD is disabled. These magnets are usually supplied by the manufacturers (JRCALC, 2013).
This illustration helped me visualize the effect of the pacemaker on the heart.
References
American Heart Association. (2015). Pacemaker [Video
illustration]. USA: Watch, Learn, and Live Interactive Cardiovascular Library.
Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee. (2013). UK ambulance services: Clinical practice guidelines 2013. Bridgwater, England: Class Professional Publishing.
Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee. (2013). UK ambulance services: Clinical practice guidelines 2013. Bridgwater, England: Class Professional Publishing.
Wesley, K. (2011). Huszar's basic
dysrythmias and acute coronary syndromes: Interpretation and management (4th
ed.). St Louis, MO: Elsevier.
No comments:
Post a Comment